Followers

Thursday, July 24, 2025

President trumps order on nil

 Here’s a comprehensive article on President Trump’s executive order titled “President Donald J. Trump Saves College Sports,” issued on July 24, 2025, outlining its scope, implications, and the critical responses it has drawn.


🏛️ Overview of the Executive Order

On July 24, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at safeguarding college sports and preserving its role in American higher education and Olympic development (The White House, The Washington Post).

Key mandates include:

  • Protecting and expanding scholarship and competition opportunities, especially in women’s, Olympic, and non-revenue sports (The White House).

  • Prohibiting third‑party “pay‑for‑play” NIL deals, unless they meet fair-market-value endorsement standards (The White House).

  • Ensuring any permitted revenue-sharing between universities and athletes safeguards non-revenue programs (The White House).

  • Directing the Labor Department and NLRB to affirm that student-athletes are not university employees, protecting amateurism (The White House).

  • Instructing the Attorney General and FTC to defend against disruptive antitrust suits and maintain college scholarship stability (The White House).

  • Requiring consultation with U.S. Olympic and Paralympic officials to preserve the pipeline of collegiate athletes in international competition (The White House).


📊 Why the Order Was Issued

The order responds to the House v. NCAA settlement, effective July 1, 2025, which opened the door to direct revenue-sharing with college athletes (Pittsburgh Sports Now). The government called fault to:

  • A fragmented state-based NIL legal patchwork in over 30 states, creating disparities and fueling “booster bidding wars” in football and men’s basketball (Yahoo News).

  • Concern that growing NIL expenditures, especially in revenue sports, may starve funding for women’s and Olympic programs (The White House).

  • Litigation threats that could undermine scholarship models and amateurism rules, including challenges to limits on transfers and duration of athletic eligibility (The White House, TigerNet.com).


🧩 Legislative Context: The SCORE Act

The executive action aligns with the SCORE Act, currently advancing through Congress. That bill seeks to:

  • Grant antitrust exemptions for the NCAA and conferences.

  • Federalize NIL regulations over state laws.

  • Cement the non-employee legal status of student-athletes (ClutchPoints, PFSN, Pittsburgh Sports Now).


📣 Support and Criticism

✅ Supporters Argue:

  • It restores order and balance to NIL and compensation practices.

  • It protects investment in non-revenue and Olympic sports amid NIL escalation (NBC Sports Bay Area).

  • Institutions like NCAA President Charlie Baker see it as a helpful complement—but not substitute—for legislation (The Washington Post).

❌ Critics Say:

  • The White House may lack the legal authority to impose these rules via executive order (ClutchPoints, PFSN, The Washington Post).

  • Legal advocates argue that the order protects the very "old NCAA model" ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court (PFSN).

  • Critics contend it curtails athletes’ rights, including revenue-sharing autonomy and possible unionization opportunities (PFSN).


🧭 What’s Next?

  • Within 30 days, the administration expects federal agencies (Education, Labor, DOJ, FTC) to draft enforcement plans, regulatory guidance, or litigation strategies to operationalize parts of the order (Yahoo News).

  • The effectiveness of the order remains legally uncertain, given constraints on executive authority without legislative backing (The Washington Post, ClutchPoints).

  • Its impact may hinge on whether the SCORE Act becomes law by September or later in the Senate session (ClutchPoints).


✏️ Summary Table

Topic What the Order Does
Scholar & roster guarantees Requires athletic departments to preserve or expand non-revenue and women’s sports spots
NIL/Pay‑for‑Play Bans booster bidding wars, allows endorsements only at fair market value
Athlete Employment & Labor Directs agencies to affirm amateur status (non‑employee)
Legal Safeguards Asks DOJ & FTC to protect scholarships from antitrust challenges
Olympic Pipeline Mandates consultation with Olympic bodies to preserve collegiate athlete contributions

🚩 Final Thoughts

President Trump’s July 24, 2025 executive order is a landmark intervention into the evolving world of college athletics. It seeks to rein in escalating NIL wars, reinforce amateurism, and protect underfunded sports. But critics warn it could limit athletes' freedoms and may lack legal teeth without legislation.

The coming weeks—and the fate of the SCORE Act—will determine whether this becomes foundational policy or an aspirational blueprint that fades under legal and political pressure.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Crimson Tide Falls Short: Oklahoma Edges Alabama 23–21

  Crimson Tide Falls Short: Oklahoma Edges Alabama 23–21 Tuscaloosa — November 17, 2025 In a heartbreaker at Bryant-Denny Stadium, No. 4...